Apparently, the bill would criminalise parents who block contact.
via Bill could criminalise mums who block contact, say dads (From HeraldScotland)
Apparently, the bill would criminalise parents who block contact.
via Bill could criminalise mums who block contact, say dads (From HeraldScotland)
One for the German readers here. A discussion about what should be done in ‘high conflict’ situations.
Take away figure (even for non-German) readers:
200,000 children are affected EVERY YEAR by separation/divorce in Germany. When just a few percent are affected by parental alienation then …
Video: Podiumsdiskussion in Kiel vom “Väteraufbruch für Kinder” e.V. – Kiel am 20. April 2017
Teilnehmer:
SPD Bernd Heinemann MdL Dipl. Sozialpädagoge – Mietglied im Sozialausschuss des Landtages
CDU Robert Vollborn – Ratsherr in Kiel
FDP Anita Klahn MdL – Mitglied im Sozialausschuss des Landtages
Die Grünen – Dr. Marret Bohn MdL – Mitglied im Sozialausschuss des Landtages
SSW Lars Harms MdL – Vorsitzender des SSW im Landtag
Piratenpartei Wolfgang Dudda MdL – Mitglied im Sozialausschusss des Landtages
Die Linke Katjana Zunft – Erzieherin , systemisch e Familien Beraterin verlies während der Veranstaltung das Podium
AFD Jörg Nobis – Mitglied im Landesvorstand Schleswig-Holstein
Anwalt Martina Comberg – Fachanwältin für Familienrecht (Kieler Modell, Zwnagsgeld, Zwangshaft, Cochemer Modell)
Moderation Markus Witt – Bundesvorstand Väteraufbruch für Kinder eV.
Um das Kind zu schützen – Maßnahmen bei hoch strittiger Elternschaft
Podiumsdiskussion des Väteraufbruch für Kinder e.V. in Kiel.
Jedes Jahr trennen sich die Eltern…
View original post 85 more words
I hope they do not mind me quoting a whole chunk of their press release. It is rather good news: Continue reading →
Just a quick post on this pic/statement that appeared on my twitter feed today.

It is hard to believe that when one is behaving properly, correctly, in control, and holding the moral high ground of somebody that is essentially the victim, that they themselves can become the ‘aggressor’.
Let’s take a practical example out of my past experiences.
I finally got my court order changed to be able to pick up my boys and take them to Munich from Saturday to Sunday the first overnight stay for a year. Just over an hour with the direct train. But there was a problem. My Ex wanted me to go from a smaller station (Eichstätt-Stadt) that feeds into a larger mainline station (Eichstätt-Bahnhof) which would increase the journey by 40 minutes, and even longer for me because to arrive at the scheduled time I would be bound by the times of the train service to the smaller station and arrive 50 minutes before I was due to pick up the kids.
The judge agreed on the transfer point being the mainline station, which is around about the same journey time by car from their house as the other station. i.e. I was not asking them to go out of their way.
Sorry about the long-winded start, but here we go – what happens on the day? I turn up on time at the court-ordered location – the mainline station. She isn’t there. Knowing her now I sense what has happened and just wait. Sure enough, she turns up on the slow train from the other station that connects with the mainline service. She gets out with the children and starts raising her voice very loudly at me immediately, in front of at least three dozen other passengers and my children. I remain calm. She escalates, starts shouting and starts to look around for support. I could see the “you bastard” or similar looks in some people’s eyes. She starts talking about additional expenses of the tickets (< €4), anything to keep the situation going. The boys go off to sit and wait and I try to extricate myself, and finally manage it because I didn’t engage with her, and I certainly did not argue the toss.
So now read the graphic again please, and what have we:
It was her way of saying ‘I do not agree with you taking the kids to Munich (100km) away, you should still visit them here in Eichstätt (Pop. 14,000) and spend just a couple of hours in a coffee shop somewhere instead of quality time with your father at his home’.
There were desserts as well. On bringing them back the mainline train was a whole – wait for it – drumroll please – five minutes late. I sent her a text and she and her boyfriend were waiting. Cue scene and shouting. Demonstrably going to the timetable to see when the train should have arrived, and if I was late there would be trouble. Again the kids were witnessing all of this, as well as her ‘man’ who lamely said ‘We can check on the internet when we get home’.
This was the first time in over a year of lawyers and judges to be able to get the children to visit me in Munich. We had a great time, the memory of which was destroyed in seconds – coincidence?
An exchange of lawyers letters ensued and she yet again managed to circumvent a court order causing me to get a train an hour early just to be at the smaller station in time and causing the children an extra half an hour travelling to Munich. It also meant reducing the time with the children by an hour on the return journey. The effect being not only extending the journey time unnecessarily, but also laying the seeds for it being tedious to go and visit Daddy every time, and the journey is so long and boring, and there are better things to do with your time …
Learning to raise your voice can sometimes have the desired effect regardless of content – unfortunately.
© 2017 lostdad – all rights reserved
Parental alienation is child abuse.
I find this story absolutely unbelievable. From everything to nothing. What are the children supposed to think about suddenly seeing their father in rigid 2-4 hour blocks? I thought most of the US was ahead of Europe wrt. PA and child access. Unfortunately, I was wrong.
Unbelievable story from Austria.
A mother kidnaps her daughter and takes her to her native Poland in December 2013, but the father manages to bring her back to Austria. He gets full custody for the daughter.
In October 2014 the partner of the father is attacked with pepper spray as she brings the daughter to the Kindergarten. She obviously brings her daughter to the grandmother in Polen and then after an international arrest order is issued the mother hands herself into the police. Leaving her daughter in Poland with the grandmother.
She is given a three-year jail sentence, which she is then able to serve out in Poland, where she is released on bail after a short while.
After following her they manage to find out where the daughter has been hidden (one of three hiding places in the time). They manage to free the daughter from the hiding place that is only rudimentary.
What on earth was this parent thinking of? The girl has not been to school in this time. Probably not even been to the doctors!
Luckily the alienation between the father and the daughter was able to be broken down a little after a couple of visits.
And after all this, the father still believes that when the dust has settled his daughter should see her mother.
Every child needs both their parents.
via Kritik an Behörden – Doppelentführung – Kind Lara gefunden! | Familie & Familienrecht
Another small confirmation that #parentalalienation #pas is started to get noticed. Might be too late for my children, but perhaps we can help those about to start on this most horrible and unwilling of all journeys.
The online presence of those affected by parental alienation is both immense and awe-inspiring. In terms of statistics, typing ‘parental alienation’ in to Google presents one with 1,170,000 results. #PAS on Twitter reaches an audience of 2,107,036 twitter accounts. There is an incalculable number of alienated parents across the developed world passionately campaigning, advocating and pleading online for some kind of social change that will effectively challenge the abuse that is parental alienation.
I myself have now become an active participant of this online community that I previously never knew existed. Like any other topic online, there is a communal sharing of experience, ideas and knowledge. However the outpouring of support for one another online is beyond words. Such support for one another is invaluable, crucial and without doubt in some cases life-saving.
An alienated parent recently tweeted his comparison of the evil of parental alienation to the Star Wars saga. ‘A battle…
View original post 243 more words
Last week the chair of Fathers for Justice published an excellent post entitled Parental Alienation is Child Abuse. I say excellent because it provided an understandable overview of what exactly parental alienation is and also how it should be classed as child abuse.
Children are alienated through the abusive conduct of the primary carer who deliberately and cynically attempts to alienate the child in order to deny the other parent contact.
Additionally, the article detailed how in the past actually mentioning or even alluding to ‘parental alienation’ caused that parent to be ‘shot down’ in the courts. Luckily this is now starting to change with the first debate in parliament on parental alienation led by Simon Danczuk on the 15th March this year. Though as Mr Danczuk has been banned for standing under the Labour party banner in the general election this year let’s see if this was a one-shot wonder.
These are all positive developments, PA is starting to become recognised both in the legal system – importantly in the lower courts, and is also becoming known to larger parts of the general public. But I would like to go further.
Parental Alienation is not only child abuse – it is the abuse of the absent parent.
Let’s take a simple case. I was walking through Munich city centre at the weekend with my new wife and my eight-year-old step-son. I passed the Apple store just off Marienplatz, and then it happened as these things always do – I started to think about my children who loved going to the Apple store, or the ‘Daddy Toy Store’ as they called it. I didn’t cry or have a breakdown, but I did ‘zone out’. I started to think about the children I cannot see, that do not want to see me because of PA. I thought of the good times, what they might be doing now, the memories came flooding back. My wife knows when this happens as I invariably become very quiet, and she gives me a big hug to bring me out. In today’s parlance, I believe what happened is that I was triggered. I get over it, and I carry on with my new life.
What my ex-partner has done, the situation she has created is abuse – she is emotionally abusing me, and using my only blood relatives as weapons. What she has done has had a profoundly negative effect on not just the life of my children now and in the future, but on my current and future life. This is not right, and for this crime, she will not have to serve time, or even be fined – it is all passively sanctioned by the state.
It is time this type of abuse was recognised, and that steps are taken to stop it.
I am one of the ‘lucky’ ones – I have built up a new life, with new loved ones. But what about those that unfortunately cannot for whatever reason? They are destined to live in a semi-permanent state of being abused, where for some there may only be the ultimate exit.
I still keep hoping that these problems will become known and that they will eventually be addressed. More has happened this year than in any other, and perhaps there will be a time where PA and abuse to children and absent parents will be regarded as what it should be – morally repugnant and simply not done in a civilised society.
Here is the original article – please take the time to have a read.
© 2017 lostdad – all rights reserved
Courts and professionals admit and acknowledge that the problem of one parent alienating children against the other parent is common and damaging to the well-being of the effected children. However it is rarely acted upon by the courts due to it currently not being recognised by any government authority in the UK. Professionals continue to see such conflict as a child custody issue, as opposed to a child protection issue. Professionals do not view parental alienation as a mental health issue. Herein lies the problem.
However a small but significant change has recently taken place. Parental alienation is now included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). The DSM serves as a universal authority for psychiatric diagnoses.
DSM-5 authors Dr. Narrow and Dr. Wamboldt state in a scientific paper in 2016 that parental alienation may be diagnosed as Child Affected by Parental Alienation Distress (V61.29)…
View original post 186 more words
Well if you have managed to open the article after the incredibly bored headline …
Coming hot on the heels of the report about the German Liberal Party supporting shared parenting, the US state of Kentucky has passed a resolution to:
What House Bill 492 does is it basically states that walking into the courtroom each parent has the presumption of 50/50 shared custody to start with.
So until permanent custody is settled, shared parenting is (apart from cases where the child is endangered) mandatory.
Though what is really interesting are the voting figures: The bill passed 97-0 in the house and 38-0 in the senate.
Why is this taking so long to be accepted and acted upon in most parts of Europe?
via Rep. Mills: Child custody change helps level playing field